Politics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 4

political science - Essay ExampleSwayed by the European lines of thought, these parties managed to grow in numbers since they appealed mostly to the oppressed multitude as intimately as the distressed workers in the country. They successfully managed to field candidates throughout the nation in numerous elected positions for the next several years. However, towards the fountain of the 1920s, these socialist movements faced severe resistance and swearword from the government and eventually broke off the movement. The parties ceased to attract numbers to support its cause in the beginning of the early 20th century, though the Socialist Labor Party remained alive until the end of the 20th century.socialist economy refers to a dust whereby the ownership and control of majority of assets in a given country is given to the central government. The coupled States, unlike former(a) countries such as Japan and Germany, has not employed this system of running the economy. Though the sys tem has worked very well in the above mentioned countries, the United States continues to thrive well without its enforcement.Politically, socialist parties in the United States began fairing very poorly in the run up to the general elections. For instance, in the year 2008, socialist candidates and their parties received less than two of the three socialist candidates (Caramani pg. 201). This is way below what other socialist candidates in other nations receive. In Germany for example, socialist parties gathered close to 50% of the total votes betray in each successive election since the 1970s.There are several theories, however, that explain this phenomena in United States politics or governance. The United States has never had a feudal system. Other nations have had hierarchical systems which was pass off from the fleet by a supreme deity while at the bottom of the system put the commoner. Such systems were discriminatory in nature since it gave too much power to the person a t the top at the expense of the common man at the bottom.